Please vote NO on Question 1! There are so many reasons why, but the most important is that it sets a very dangerous precedent. I'll also discuss the school board candidates below [Spoiler: State Board 9: Avalie Muhlestein and Julie King in ASD 1 (Westlake HS area)]. Please study and be informed before casting your ballot.NO ON QUESTION 1: A Dangerous Precedent
Question 1 is a polling question. To my knowledge, we have never had an opinion poll on our ballots. So, instead of paying lobbyists to lobby the legislature or to get signatures for a ballot initiative, you are being used by an organization that was unable to accomplish their objectives by either of those options. If you can't change laws the regular way, and you're rich and famous, you try to find a way around the normal lawmaking process. Co-opting citizens to pressure lawmakers is now a thing.
Question 1 doesn't change A SINGLE THING. But the proponents HOPE the legislature will increase gas taxes, and then play a shell game to get SOME of that money into K-12, (as well as Higher Ed and Roads and money for UDOT. Shhh! Don't tell anyone that part. It isn't as emotionally appealing as grade-school kids.) Legislators also know that GAS TAX CANNOT be used for Education under our Utah Constitution (hence the shell game). If lots of people vote yes on Question 1, then the Question 1 proponents can browbeat legislators into passing, supposedly, their version of legislation that they were unable to get signatures for to get on the ballot. (Of course, politics being what it is, there is no guarantee that what we end up with will look anything like what the proponents are selling.)
But we want more money in K-12 education! Do the ends justify the means? Never! Why are legislators wary of raising taxes? Because the legislators must represent their constituents and run for re-election. Gas taxes negatively impact those who are struggling, working multiple jobs to make ends meet, and those who live farther away in rural areas than those on the Wasatch Front. Legislators in those areas would be motivated to discuss and debate ways in which their constituents will be less impacted. However, the majority of people in Utah live on the Wasatch Front. So, Question 1 Proponents assume the majority of Utahns will support Question 1. If you and your neighbors can feel good about "helping kids" (and college students and roads), then who cares if we make those who can least afford the gas tax increase suffer? Majority rules. And tyranny by the majority is becoming the way to get your pet policies passed into law, especially if you're rich and can spend tons of money to influence an election.
The solution: Donate RIGHT NOW to our Alpine District Foundation. Don't wait for the legislature or Our Schools Now or a ballot initiative. You can donate to:
- the district as a whole,
- an entire school (look to donate to our specialty schools like Summit, Polaris, Horizon, or Dan Peterson),
- a program: band, drama, history, or
- directly to a classroom at a given school.
For more information on my concerns with Question 1, click here to see my video. (Side note: did you know Utah spends the largest percentage (40%) of its budget on education, more than any other state in the country?)
In the future, if Question 1 succeeds in changing state law, mark my words, it will become the method of choice for those with time and money to circumvent the average person's voice. Just a reminder that checks and balances and separation of powers are the bedrocks of our freedom. Direct democracy: going to the majority of the people and using them as the big stick to beat the legislators up with, violates those principles and disenfranchises those who don't have the time, money or power to object. This is an unraveling of the checks and balances that prevent that other "golden rule"--the person with the gold, makes the rules--from destroying freedom. Success on Question 1 doesn't bode well for freedom in the future. Please VOTE NO on QUESTION 1, and I promise you it doesn't mean you hate children.
School Board Races
I, personally, like both District 9 candidates for State Board. However, if you voted for me because of my support for traditional math and my opposition to Common Core, you will want to support Avalie Muhlestein. I appreciate her outside-the-box vision for education, and her desire to get rid of so much state-level accountability that sucks up time, money, and other resources that could be returned to the local level to pay more for teachers. At the end of the day, we have state-level accountability because we don't trust our local people and our local teachers. I want to trust our local people and get the state out of the accountability and data collection business. I recommend you read through her platform and her issues, and consider a donation to Avalie's campaign.
Alpine School District:
The West area is the only race for ASD where there is much discussion and debate (see below). For the other 3 races, I predict Amber Bonner (my area--ASD2), Sarah Beeson (AF--ASD3), and Ada Wilson (W. Orem--ASD5). I had actually hoped there would be more debate, discussion and involvement in these races. But, unfortunately, very few people are willing to run for school board. (3 seats are up in 2 more years, so start thinking about public service.) While it is often a thankless job, our society is stronger when people are willing to step up to the plate and serve their community in elective office. I'm grateful for all those who have thrown their hats into this ring.
For those in my area, I will be voting for Amber Bonner. Amber is very active and involved, has kids still in the schools, and asks questions. She thinks things through, and wants, more than anything, to have smaller class sizes. And she find ways to support teachers. I think Amber will do an excellent job as our representative. And most importantly (to me, at least), Amber listens to different perspectives. And even if you see things differently, Amber knows you can still "care about kids." (Our inside joke.)
In ASD 1 (Westlake area), again, I, personally, like both the candidates. But, my endorsement goes 110% to Julie King (see here and here). Julie is a tireless advocate for parents and for finding ways to make things work for those kids who just don't fit neatly in the "box". Instead of trying to find ways to make everyone the same, Julie is actively facilitating parents finding the perfect match for their individual kids in our system. Julie is a "doer". She has been a District Community Council rep at our special needs school out west, Horizon. On one of her first visits, she realized they had serious problems with the entry doors. She took it upon herself to find a way to get those doors fixed. Julie is supportive of fixing math, getting better standards (not CC or NGSS), expanding Gifted and Talented options, securing Data Privacy, and PARENTAL RIGHTS. My only regret about not running again is not being able to serve with Julie on the board. We have served together on the State Board's Data Privacy Commission, and she always has such interesting insights from her experience in Social Work, with the Juvenile Justice system, and as a Foster Parent. Whether you are in her voting area or not, please consider donating to her campaign.